Monday, November 17, 2014

Dec 1st Finals of Geneva Competition live-stream

(click to enlarge or use pdf links below)
Dear Flutists,

Update May 2016 - Watch the videos of the Nielson to see many of the competitors here (videos)

Update December 5th

Viviana Guzman interviews Adriana Ferreir by video to ask about memorization skills, preparation and learning experience. See video.

Robert Dick wrote to the email flute groups reminding readers of his (great!) essay with all details of being a judge at the Geneva competition. So much is so well explained.
Read here: Robert Dick talks about Geneva Flute Judging


Update: December 2nd:

The Geneva International Flute Competition 2014 finals are still online for full viewing:
Watch the three finalists here: Video of Mozart & Jolivet played by three finalists.


If your computer speed is too slow for streaming, click on "HD" at the lower edge of the film, and change to a lower speed.

I voted for the second candidate to win.
He's so musical, so confident, and so relaxed.
An amazing prodigy at 17 years of age. He started flute at 9 years old.
I could NOT believe his soft fingers, and only noticed the offset to the right embouchure half way through. What an amazing player! See for yourself.
I found the two female players far too tense. (I don't blame them, of course).
The tension inhibited their performances, I felt.

Who won?
See the results here.

Norman Lebrecht writes about the Geneva results: short post.

Jen


Update Nov 28th:
Sebastian Jacot who recently won the Nielsen competition, himself responded to questions about his not passing to the semi-final round with detailed account of his experience at Geneva.  (quoted below):
http://slippedisc.com/2014/11/when-a-competition-eliminates-the-finest-artist/

------------
Sébastian Jacot writes:
Dear all,
I am very surprised at how many people actually follow what i do, i had no idea i was under such high surveillance I just want to answer the question “why do i do competitions”
I have never pushed myself technically musically physically psychologically further than i did during these competitions.
i have learned so much about myself, what i can do and what i cannot what i could do i what i cannot do anymore and i don’t regret anything from it.
For this Geneva Competition i only had a month to prepare and learn by memory about 15 pieces. If i had not participated in this competition, i would have never imposed myself such a task.
I don’t see the competitions as a goal in itself, i rather see it as a good challenge and exercise.
When i came to Geneva i already had a feeling i wasn’t gonna go all the way to the end.
I had worked 300 hours on a program almost completely new to me in a very short time and was extremely tired. And by looking at who advanced to the second round and who did not it was already clear that they were eliminating imperfection and waiting for the last two rounds to take into account the personality the musicianship maturity and integrity of the players.
Not that they didn't judge these aspects in the first two rounds but they were clearly not the main criterias.
I still wanted to see how far i could push myself.
If my goal was to win Geneva i should not have come or should not have taken part in the Nielsen Competition before and prepare longer.

The jury’s decision is fair i think because they have been very clear and consistent about what they were looking for specially in the first few rounds.
Clean precise and well prepared playing.
I could provide all these aspects in the first round but in the second with such a challenging program of 9 pieces i was a few days short of sleep or preparation and i could not be as impressively precise as they were expecting.The program i had prepared was also not made to impress but rather to touch. Wrong choice maybe this time.
I had just bought a new Lafin headjoint a month before and the broken wooden headjoint from Nielsen came back fixed only a week before the competition tuned a quarter tone lower than before and thus forcing me to play Schumann on the metal flute..the judges don’t want to know why or how or any excuses…they heard me play Schumann bit out of tune and they judge this.
Let’s say it was an entertaining, exciting and well executed program for a concert but just not perfect enough technically for this particular competition where so many young perfect technicians came.
Now i will finish preparing Jolivet concerto for the final so i have one more concerto to my repertoire and i will not have waisted the 250.- of inscription fee..
I will probably do ARD but will be more prepared in all subjects and improve from what i learned here at home In Geneva.
All my best wishes to you all!
Sébastian

Semifinalists list:
http://www.concoursgeneve.ch/?a=collapse31

_________________ Original post:

Background info. on the contest:

http://www.concoursgeneve.ch/sections/flute_2014

http://www.concoursgeneve.ch/site/app/webroot/kcfinder/upload/files/press_kit_2014_en_low.pdf

______________
Thanks Dianne for all your helpful updates! :>)

Friday, November 07, 2014

Electronic Tuner or Tuning CD?



Question:
Which should I practice with: The Tuning CD or an Electronic Tuner? I've been trying to use both simultaneously and I'm confused.

Jen's Answer:

Well, basically, the Electronic Tuner can analyse if you are playing all your notes sharp, or all notes flat, but it's no substitute for actual human ears, and it doesn't know what you're doing in a musical context. :>)

1. The Electronic Tuner does not know what key you're in so can only be used to occasionally match a piano, and no other instrument.

And because of the way pianos are actually tuned (by humans), the higher notes of the piano may often be sharper than the tuner shows, and the bass notes flatter.

See this chart of typical pianos after being tuned and note the sharpness of the flute range notes and how they are not predictable (nor would the electronic Tuner be set up to mimic this phenomena.) Stunning information, isn't it?



Source of above diagram: http://www.precisionstrobe.com/apps/pianotemp/temper.html

To play in tune with any other instrument that can change its pitch (woodwinds, strings, brass etc.), every note in the scale of a key must be slightly higher or lower than what would be shown on the electronic Tuner.
The Tuner cannot know what key you're in, nor what interval you are tuning, and will only show Equal Temperament and will therefore be wrong.

Here's the chart of higher and lower for each interval below. Notice how wrong the tuner would be for each "in tune" interval.

  Table of intervals expressed as cents

Ratio          Interval         In Tune     Electronic Tuner (wrong)
---------------------------------------
 1/1         perfect unison     0 cents - Tuner would say: 0
25/24  "small" minor second    71 cents
16/15  "large" minor second   112 cents - Tuner would say: 100
10/9   "short" major second   182 cents
 9/8    "long" major second   204 cents - Tuner would say: 200
 6/5            minor third   316 cents - Tuner would say: 300
 5/4            major third   386 cents - Tuner would say: 400
 4/3         perfect fourth   498 cents - Tuner would say: 500
36/25      diminished fifth   631 cents - Tuner would say: 600
 3/2          perfect fifth   702 cents - Tuner would say: 700
25/16       augmented fifth   773 cents
 8/5            minor sixth   814 cents - Tuner would say: 800
 5/3            major sixth   884 cents - Tuner would say: 900
 9/5          minor seventh  1018 cents - Tuner would say: 1000
15/8          major seventh  1088 cents - Tuner would say: 1100
 2/1         perfect octave  1200 cents - Tuner would say: 1200

As you can see: The Electronic Tuner is wrong most of the time.


2. The eyes are not good at hearing "in tune-ness".

Musicians need to tune 'on the spot', all the time, and very quickly. Therefore their ears have to be very fast at picking up what is in tune and what is not.
The eyes looking at an electronic tuner are not connected to the ears in this way.
The eyes see the indications of flatness and sharpness, and then make the slow correction of telling the body to adjust to play flatter or sharper.
The ears are usually ignored while this is happening.
This is exactly as crazy-making as attempting to train your ears to hear "sky blue" or "ocean green" or "yellow sunshine".
The ears are not good at eye tasks either.
It's far smarter to train to use the ears for musical tuning, not the eyes.


3. In modern music, the key center changes constantly:

If you're in the key of G major, and you're playing in tune (the major third B-natural, is 14 cents flat to what the tuner says it should be, and it sounds beautifully in tune to the G root), and then the composer suddenly modulates to E minor, or D major, then your pitches must now conform to the new key.

But an electronic tuner doesn't know that your piece of music has modulated.

In the key of D major, the B-natural is the sixth note of the scale, and has to be 16 cents flat to the tuner.
In the key of E minor, the B-natural is the fifth note of the scale and needs to be 2 cents sharper than what the tuner says.

So as the piece of music modulates from key to key, the B-natural would have to change to be in tune against the new tonic.

If you're using the Tuning CD, and your etude, piece or solo modulates, you just change the drone from G to E or B.
You play along with a new drone.
If it modulates back to G major, you just switch back to the droning G on the Tuning CD again.

This can also happen even quicker, and in an even more subtle way; if the composer borrows chords from a nearby key if even for a split second  while still staying in the home key.

In colourful music, sometimes the added "colourful" chord might be, for example an A major chord with a C# in it, in G major! This chord may well be resolving to a D major chord, which then resolves back to the basic G major chord.  (V of V, going to V, going to I ) This all happens in a moment.

During these colourful chords, to play in tune might mean bending certain notes only for a fraction of a second.
(The C# in the Amajor chord will be resolving "ti-doh" to D major, so that's where it will get its tuning from.)

This is all done much faster by ear, and all the while, the Tuner will never know what you are doing and why.
It cannot figure it out like you can. :>)


4. In ensembles, the pitch changes constantly:

The Tuner is no use when the entire ensemble starts at A-440, and then through physical increases in heat or cold then sharpens or flattens progressively, or even momentarily (Causes: air conditioning, drafts, heated bodies in small rooms, some players playing sharper and sharper over several minutes to hear themselves more clearly etc.)

Ensembles do not stay at A-440.
You can use your tuner to check any professional recording. You will be surprised.

Using a very accurate tuner, during an exciting 6 minute Overture, a professional orchestra was once clocked at rising from A-440 to A-448 from beginning to ending, six minutes later.
They did it through EXCITEMENT and PANACHE.

There would be no point telling them they are now incredibly sharp; they all have to follow each other no matter what and end up in tune with eachother.

Then there are physical factors:

In a very cold rehearsal space, the instruments that go flat from cold (brass/woods) can only push in their tuning slides so far.
In a very warm rehearsal space, the instruments that go flat from heat (strings) cannot stop playing to retune each individual string, so may have to stop using open strings to remain fingering the notes higher as the room heats up.

All of this has to be momentarily accomodated while still continuing to play.
The Tuner cannot know any of this is happening. Only your ears can.


5. Your good tuning also depends on whether you're the Root, the Third, or the Fifth or Seventh of a Chord.

An electronic tuner does not know which interval of a chord you are playing.
While the person on the root of the chord may be fine consulting a Tuner, the person on the third of the chord needs to be 14 cents flatter, and the person on the fifth needs to be 2 cents sharper than what the tuner says.

If any of the other factors come into play (hot/cold, excitement of playing sharper to be heard, or any instrument playing out of tune for any reason) then even the person on the root of the chord can be incredibly "wrong" and yet they will sound their note, regardless.
If so, everyone else in the chord must shift their notes to accomodate the root or tonic they are being given to play with.
This happens constantly in any ensemble.
A tuner cannot know any of this is happening.

So use The Tuning CD and here's why:

The good news is that on notes of quick duration, bad tuning is not as audible, as there is very little time for the ear to hear the "beats" of out-of-tune intervals.
This is also true of very low pitched instruments: the "beats" that annoy the ear are quite slow, and will only be noticeable if a chord is held for several seconds.

But for high instruments, where "beats" are fast and annoying between out-of-tune notes (high woodwinds, sopranos etc.) even quick, short notes can be heards as annoyingly out of tune.

Also, in a melody, intervals between notes of the melody are more noticeable the slower the melody is.

That means that the intricacies and expertise in tuning of chords and melodic intervals is more needed in slow music, or on notes of long duration, where the out-of-tune intervals are more audible.

So always spend more time tuning slow moving music, and higher pitched instruments, always listening to the root of the chord, and assessing your distance above it, to eliminate "beats" in the sound.

All you have to do:
Start by tuning long held notes with the Tuning CD until your ears begin to witness the restful feeling of being "in tune".

Everything else you'll do starts from a simple scale, played slowly, against a constant drone.

Example:

Drone G on the Tuning CD (plays G to D perfect fifth interval plus octave G above).

Play a slow scale spending much time on each note. Listen and adjust until you find beauty and serenity on each note.

Jiggle the note you are playing until it sounds beautiful against the drone. Some will bend up, some down.

"Beats" will disappear and the sound will become smoother as you get closer to the pure intervals.
(for hearing "Beats" listen to this mp3 of flute with the Tuning CD; they sound like "Wah-wah-wah". Your job is to bend your note until the wah-wahs disappear).

The most important intervals for ensemble playing are:

Root, Third, and Fifth.

Playing these in tune with the Tuning CD will lead you to adding Seconds, Sixths and Sevenths, which are also super beautiful to hear when they are in tune (especially seconds which are complex and full of motion.)

Have fun.

Your ears will soon know what they're doing.
The Electronic Tuner will never learn anything new. :>)

Best, Jen